I am now publishing written commentary, stories, and analyisis on Medium.
Click here to visit!

Photo Search:


Expand Collapse





All Photo Categories
Africa
  Egypt
  Mali
  Morocco
  Sahara Desert
  Tanzania
  Africa Montage
  Togo
  Benin
  Mossi/Gurunsi
  Burkina Faso

Europe
  Amsterdam
  Czech Republic
  Croatia
  England
  Norway
  Iceland
  Ireland
  Italy
  France
  Greece
  Hungary
  Portugal
  Spain
  Scotland
  Slovenia
  Slovakia
  Switzerland

LatinAmerica
  Argentina
  Patagonia
  Chile
  Cuba
  Costa Rica
  Buenos Aires
  Peru
  Bolivia
  Ecuador
  Galápagos
  Mexico

Miscellaneous
  Videos
  Color Sampler
  B&W Photos
  B&W/Color
  Manholes
  Dad's Photos 

Other Places
  Bahamas
  Canada
  Jerusalem

Information
  General FAQ
  Photo Tips
  Photo Biz
  My Blog

Special Topics
  Videos
  Great Sunsets
  Redwoods
  Lightning
  Star Trails
  Nite
  The Moon
  Fog
  Reflections
  Flowers
  Doors
  Stairs
  Windows
  Laundry
  B&W Photos

United States
  Alaska
  Arizona
  California
  Hawaii
  Idaho
  Indiana
  Wyoming
  The Midwest
  Montana
  Nevada
  New Mexico
  New Orleans
  New York City
  Oregon
  Orlando
  Utah
  Washington
  Yellowstone

Asia & Pacific
  Japan
  Bhutan
  Tibet
  Kathmandu
  Cambodia
  Vietnam
  Loas
  Sydney, Oz
  New Zealand
  Moscow
  Palau

People/Animals
  Women/Models
  Couples
  Kids
  Dogs
  Animals
  Horses
  Cows
  Birds
  Butterflies

You Are Here:  Home  >  FAQ  >  Photography Techniques  >  What Camera Should I Buy? (Part 2)

What Camera Should I Buy? (Part 2)

Table of Contents

Chapter Word Count: 1848
1 Preface  (169)
2 Digital Photography for the Consumer  (661)
3 Technical Factors  (23)
       3.1 Resolution  (78)
       3.2 Dynamic Range  (314)
       3.3 White Balance  (224)
       3.4 Memory  (227)
       3.5 Summary (152)

This page has 8 images dated from
Nov 1, 2001 to Jan 3, 2002
Markers indicate locations for photos on this page. Accuracy responsibility of Google Maps
Google Map Goes Here
If you see this text, the map is still loading (or there's an error).
Click to recommend this page:

1 Preface

magnifier.gif
"Should I buy a digital camera?"
(San Francisco, California, USA)
california, people, petes, san francisco, vertical, west coast, western usa, photograph
I am often asked, "What kind of digital camera should I buy?" There are many answers to this question, but it all comes down to two categories: professional and consumer. I'll address both categories in this chapter, but as you can imagine, there is a cross-over between the two: the high-end consumer cameras can start to look a lot like the low-end professional brands. Because of that, and prices dropping so fast, many consider this middle-ground as viable alternatives, even if they aren't professional.

The discussions that follow will address the main overview points to think about when considering cameras to buy. I do not review specific camera models, brands, or make any other recommendations. However, you should glean valuable information from this page so you can make better sense of the reviews that you see from other sources. For a far more in depth look at the topic, look at www.dpreview.com.

magnifier.gif
Taken with a Fuji Finepix Digital
(California, USA)
rose, closeup, plants, fujipix, horizontal, closeup, rose, plants, fujipix, photograph

If you're a non-professional photographer and you just want to get fun pictures for the vacation, the point-n-shoot camera is for you. Despite the fact that I own an expensive, professional-level digital camera (see "professional" section below), I also enjoy using the simple consumer point-n-shoots—they're light, simple, and get the job done. Just about any brand, make and model is technically suitable, but you should still test them yourself for personal tastes.

Determining which brand is best for you requires two things: learning about what to look for (which is why you're here, right?), and trying them out at a store. Like any other expensive electronic object, never buy something you don't actually put in your own hands. Also, never base a purchasing decision on a feature you don't understand, or know why you need it. The most important factor in deciding what camera to buy is visualizing how you'd use it on a day to day basis. You may think you're just going to point and shoot, but there's more. How quickly does it "shoot" from the time you press the button? This is the most annoying factor that people complain about with their cameras. The time is takes for you to press the button and when the picture is actually taken, the child's facial expression can change, or the dancers may have moved.

magnifier.gif
Sunset Couple
(California, USA)
couple, fujipix, sunset, horizontal, couples, couple, fujipix, sunset, photograph
Other things to look for: is there a self-timer? Does it have a macro mode (for shooting closeups of flowers and such)? Can you adjust the flash output? And probably the most important feature, but something you cannot test in the store, is how quickly they consume batteries. (And whether they even take regular batteries that you can buy in a store, or their own proprietary rechargable batteries.) (There are pros and conts to both.) Rechargeable batteries are great most of the time, but you can't recharge batteries in the middle of a day at the beach. Also, if you're planning on going outside the country, battery chargers often don't come with power converters for those countries that don't use the US-based 110v plugs. (Power adapters won't work—you need to actually convert the current, or you will damage the camera and the battery.)

magnifier.gif
Muir Woods
(California, USA)
woods, slow exposure, vertical, fujipix, muir, woods, muir, fujipix, photograph
What most people want from a digital point-n-shoot is simplicity. They don't want to deal with settings, confusing interfaces, and having to hit multiple buttons just to perform a simple operation. For example, how many buttons does it take to delete the last picture you just took? For me, that's the litmus test for good user interface design. User interfaces are hard to get right, because the simpler the interface, the fewer features there are (typically, but not always). Cameras that require too much futzing around (what I call this the "futz factor") are usually quite featureful in their options, but it's too much for most consumers. Your tolerance for such things may vary, but the lessons here are:

blue-bullet.gif Don't avoid cameras that have capabilities you don't think you'll use.

You just may use them later, and there's probably a good reason that any given feature is there.

blue-bullet.gif You will get used to whatever you buy.

Since you can't get everything in one product, don't sweat it if something seems like it might be a problem. Draw upon past experiences of what you like and don't like about the picture-taking process to determine if what you're used to will map over to digital photography well.

blue-bullet.gif If you're not happy with the photos, it may not be the camera's fault!

Some people often complain that photos are not sharp, that they are often washed out or under- or over- exposed. Nine times out of ten, this is not the camera's fault—it's the human's fault for not using it properly. For more discussion, check the page, Why do some prints just look awful?.

magnifier.gifgallery.gif(More Images)
Shot with a 2-megapixel Fuji finepix Digital Camera
(California, USA)
california, falls, leaves, marin, marin county, north bay, northern california, plants, san francisco bay area, vertical, west coast, western usa, photograph

There are basically three technical factors associated with the camera's digital sensor that you should consider: resolution, dynamic range, and memory.

Most consumer-level digital cameras these days range from 5 to 8 megapixels, which will be obsolete by this time next year, I'm sure. What these numbers indicate is the total number of "pixels" (the dot that reprepsents a color) in an image. These days, any consumer digital point-n-shoot camera has enough megapixels to make good prints. So, you aren't necessarily looking for quanitity in your resolution. Instead, you want quality, which brings us to the next point:

ylw-text.gif magnifier.gif
Shot with Film: Dynamic Range too Broad for Digital Sensors
(California, USA)
california, lightning, marin, marin county, north bay, northern california, san francisco bay area, scenics, square format, west coast, western usa, photograph
Image resolution is just its width and the height in pixels. More important, however, is a camera's latitude. That is, its ability to capture detail in the extreme ranges of highlights and shadows. While people may debate the need for more megapixels beyond a certain point, there is always the need for more latitude. And this brings us back again to megapixels, since it just so happens that improving latitude has a by-product of increasing megapixel capabilities. So, it's often the case that higher-megapixel cameras will take better pictures than lower-megapixel cameras, simply because they have a broader range of light—that is, improved latitude. Most consumer brand cameras don't have the kind of latitude found in professional-level cameras, but, most consumers don't necessarily have the eye to pick up on these subtler details anyway. The more discerning photographer, however, may have to jump to the semi-pro level cameras for that extra boost.

When it comes to both dynamic range and actual megapixel count, the thing to remember is that your camera can't achieve its own optimal potential unless the camera's resolution is set to its highest resolution setting. The most common mistake people make is setting their camera to shoot at low resolution (small size) to save on memory so they don't fill up their one and only memory card on a vacation. The reasoning is obvious: one can double or triple the number of pictures a single card can hold using this method. The result, however, is bad-looking prints. (If you're shooting for computer use only, then shooting at low resolution is fine, but more often than not, people think they're only shooting for the web, but end up realizing they want to make a print, and then regret not having used a higher resolution setting.)

magnifier.gif
Sammy and Bougainvillea
(California, USA)
pooches, fujipix, sammy, dogs, horizontal, fujipix, sammy, dogs, photograph

Different lighting conditions produce different values for how the camera perceives colors. Most cameras have an auto-balancing mode that senses the colors in the scene to estimate probable color values. (They do this using a method called, "white balancing", which is an oversimplification for this discussion.) Some cameras allow you to manually set the lighting conditions (such as sunny, cloudy, sunset, indoor light bulbs, fluorescent lights, etc.), or you can set the white balance based on a given picture that you've just taken (say, of a white piece of paper). This is getting into modes that most consumers don't want to have to deal with, and which explains one of the many menu items you'll see when you start evaluating your "futz factor tolerance levels." Almost no one will ever futz with the white balance, despite the fact that it's a great feature. For example, if you are shooting a sunset, and you set the white balance to "cloudy," then your sunset will be really warm and gorgeous. Sure, it'll be good on a the normal setting, but it'll be just that much better on the cloudy setting. Are you ever going to do this? Probably not. Most people don't care enough, and if they did, they wouldn't be buying point-n-shoot cameras. But, it's there!

magnifier.gif
Dusk at the Golden Gate Bridge
(California, USA)
vertical, fujipix, golden gate bridge, fujipix, golden gate bridge, photograph

For many people, a memory card of 512M is enough for a good week-long trip shooting at high resolution, suitable for making nice-looking prints. The price of memory is coming down every day, and even today's prices means that you usually only need one memory card. I would recommend no less than a 1-gigabyte card, simply because they're a one-time expense (unlike how film used to be), and this can probably last the duration of a major vacation.

What you don't want to happen (but always does), is you run out of memory, and then frantically review all your other pictures, trying desparately to figure out what you delete, in order to free up enough memory to shoot more. While this does hone your editing skills, and it's good to get rid of bad pictures, it's far better to simply have more memory cards with you. I have no recommendations for how much memory is appropriate. If you go nuts with a camera, you'll know in pretty short order whether you need to buy more. After you "download" the pictures to your computer, or at the photo lab to print pictures, you can erase the card and you can shoot again. It also helps that you can preview images and remove unwanted pictures right away, freeing up more space on your card as time goes on.

Any digital camera today can take perfectly good pictures. The deciding factors have nothing to do with camera quality, and everything to do with personal preferences and aesthetics. For example, many people feel that weather-proofing is important—in fact, many underwater digital cameras make perfect everyday cameras as well, so if you ever shoot while snorkeling or want to take it the beach of pool, that may be another important consideration. The most important thing you can do is personal research on the net, and then go to stores and play (for hours) with different models to see what you like and don't like. Be wary of sales people (or anyone) that tries to push you into a particular brand or model. There is never a simple, easy solution that is custom-made for you. The most helpful people are those who try to explain differences without trying to talk you into anything.

Click to recommend this page: